Example 5: Comparison between flat and ribbed rafts
Description of the problem
A ribbed raft may be used where the distance between columns is so great
that a flat raft
requires excessive depth, with resulting high bending moments. Consequently,
the volume of
concrete is reduced. A ribbed raft consists of a stiffened slab by girders
in x- and y-directions.
The girders on the raft may be either down or up the slab. Ribbed rafts can
be used for many
structures when a flat level for the first floor is not required. Such
structures are silos, elevated
tanks and various other possible structures. Although this type of
foundation has many
disadvantages if used in normally buildings, still uses by many designers.
Such disadvantages
are: the raft needs deep foundation level under the ground surface, fill
material on the raft to
make a flat level. In addition, a slab on the fill material is required to
be constructed for the first
floor. The use of the ribbed raft relates to its simplicity in analysis by
traditional manners or
hand calculations. Particularly, if the columns are arranged in lines. The
ribbed raft generally
leads to less concrete quantity than the flat raft, especially if the
columns have heavy loads and
large spans.
In this example two types of rafts, flat and ribbed rafts, are considered as
shown in Figure (49).
The length of each raft is L = 14.3 [m] while the width is B = 28.3 [m].
Each raft carries 15
column loads and a brick wall load of p = 30 [kN/m] at its edges. Width of
ribs is chosen to be
bw = 0.30 [m] equal to the minimum side of columns, while the height of ribs
including the slab
thickness is chosen to be hw+hf = 1.0 [m]. Column dimensions, reinforcement
and loads are
shown in Table (53). A thin plain concrete of thickness 0.20 [m] is chosen
under the raft and is
not considered in any calculation. |